Fragmentation & IDS evasion¶
1. Context & stakes¶
Overlapping fragments to defeat IDS reassembly.
IP fragmentation lets a packet be split and reassembled, but endpoints and IDS can disagree on how to reassemble overlapping fragments. An attacker crafts overlaps so the IDS sees benign data while the target reassembles the attack, slipping past inspection. This is a core Ptacek-Newsham evasion, and RFC-consistent reassembly enforced by the IDS is the fix.
2. Theory¶
IP fragments are reassembled by the destination via offset/ID/MF fields. An IDS must reassemble too; if it does so differently from the host (overlapping fragments, divergent timeouts/TTL) the attacker shows the IDS one stream and the host another - the classic Ptacek-Newsham insertion/evasion.
3. Attack (PoC)¶
- Overlapping fragments
- Divergent order/TTL host vs IDS
4. Detection¶
Indicators to watch, and the associated IDS rule (see
netlab-ids).
5. Defense¶
- Full reassembly on the IDS
- Drop overlaps
6. Exercise¶
Reproduce in the isolated lab (netns/veth): see lab setup.
7. Further reading¶
- RFC 791 (IP fragmentation), RFC 1858 (fragmentation attacks)
- Ptacek & Newsham, Insertion, Evasion, and DoS (1998)